 Susan Aldridge
|
There are many challenges upstream and downstream in manufacturing a biotech drug. Research on the upstream side in recent
years has produced gene expression systems that have allowed for dramatic increases in yields of monoclonal antibodies, new
vaccines and recombinant proteins. Downstream developments are catching up, with products such as the disposable Rhobust column
from Upfront Chromatography (Denmark) and GE Healthcare's PreDictor, which is a 96-well plate system for rapid testing of
purification conditions such as pH and ionic strength. However, purification is not the end of manufacture — it is just the
beginning of the end.
The main challenge of getting a biotech drug from this stage to the patient is the delicate and unpredictable nature of protein
molecules. According to Geoff Helleswell of Micropharm (UK), the manufacture of their anti-sera and polyclonal antibody products
takes a couple of days, but formulation, filling and signing off a batch can take 4–6 weeks. The cost of formulation and filling,
as well as ensuring stability, is a big issue for the company as it produces antivenoms for countries, such as Nigeria, that
cannot afford expensive freeze drying, which is a popular formulation technology for protein drugs.
"There are several stages involved in the formulation and filling of a biotech drug", says Helleswell. Some of them are similar
to those for small molecule drugs, but regulatory authorities often demand more data for a protein drug because of its inherent
instability, and various tests must be done on the bulk product, with bioburden (microbial content), protein concentration,
and virus removal or inactivation being the most important.
SterilizationAt this stage, the question arises as to whether the product can be terminally sterilized. For a biologic, the answer is usually
'no' as protein molecules unravel when exposed to the heat of a sterilization operation. Therefore, filtration into a previously
sterilized container will be necessary, with a recommended second filtration step immediately prior to filling. "Double filtration
is very important for biologics," says Helleswell.
 The author says...
|
At this stage, the product is being exposed to the air so consideration must be given to the environmental conditions for
filling. "The environment in which the filling is done is critical," explains Helleswell. An EU Grade C environment is fine
if terminal sterilization is intended, but the higher Grade A is necessary if the product has to be filled under aseptic conditions,
meaning that manufacturers, including CMOs, must invest in the appropriate clean room technology if they are going to do their
own formulation and filling.
Most biopharmaceutical products are injected. This means preparing either a freeze-dried solid product that is reconstituted
in the clinic or solutions that are contained in either capped vials or sealed ampoules. Prefilled syringes, for ease of patient
use, are an increasingly attractive alternative in some applications. Additives, such as salts or preservatives, might be
necessary to stabilize the protein and keep it stable for whatever storage times and conditions are appropriate to the final
end use. A great deal of development work is needed to select the most appropriate additives to ensure they do not give any
untoward clinical side-effects.
Inspection
The filled product must be inspected for complete closure and for visible and subvisible contamination. Meanwhile, sterility
is checked with samples that are representative of the whole batch. Other tests, such as protein concentration, pH, osmolality
and activity may also be required.
Visual inspection, which can be performed by eye by a validated operator or with an automated visual inspection machine using
lasers, is an important check. Regulatory authorities have requirements for clarity and place limits on even subvisible particles
in a product. Proteins tend to precipitate, adsorb onto surfaces, or aggregate — all of which can cause visible or invisible
deposits.
The clinical significance of aggregation processes — particularly whether they can cause unwanted immune side-effects — is
currently a subject of some debate. No protein product can be guaranteed to be 100% free of aggregation, but it should be
understood and controlled as much as possible for a particular process and product. Aggregation often goes undetected and
the underlying causes can be quite complex. pH and ionic strength of the formulation mix tend to be important factors and
freeze drying often causes aggregation in some products when they are reconstituted. Aggregation can also occur during transport
of a product by the use of pumps and even certain types of packaging. Additionally, shaking a protein solution is less likely
to cause aggregation than stirring it.
Visual inspections are important for assessing formulation stability as well as protein aggregation. There are a number of
approaches for assessing the particle content of a protein solution. Light extinction methods are used to work out the actual
size of the particle, but they are not applicable if the particle is translucent. Sometimes the sample must be diluted, which
can cause interfering air bubbles, and may, in itself, cause aggregation.