September 2, 2006 By:Richard J. Forsyth, Jeffrey Hartman, Vincent Van Nostrand Pharmaceutical Technology
Before formal cleaning validation programs were instituted, visual inspection was the primary means of determining equipment cleanliness. The use of visual inspection is still typically a component of a cleaning validation program and for routine inspections of cleaning effectiveness, but the use of visual inspection as a sole criterion for equipment cleanliness has not been successfully implemented as a valid approach for cleaning validation.
 |
April 25, 2007 By:Maribel Rios INTERPHEX Show Daily
Interphex2007, New York, NY (Apr. 25)-As manufacturers prepare for processing more-potent compounds, they seek effective clean-in-place (CIP) and wash-in-place (WIP) design systems.
 |
March 2, 2006 By:José E. Martinez Pharmaceutical Technology
Adding a cleaning step to the field-testing protocol, and combining it with the data generated to register sanitizing and disinfectant agents under FIFRA and the CEN TC 216 work program, produces a sanitation-and-disinfection validation methodology that is cost-effective, simple, and time-saving.
 |
March 2, 2006 By:Kaylynn Chiarello-Ebner Pharmaceutical Technology
Analytical tools and methods that require less water and detergent are gaining interest for faster, more efficient cleaning.
 |
October 2, 2005 By:Richard J. Forsyth, Vincent Van Nostrand Pharmaceutical Technology
Formulation residue, observer viewing distance, light intensity, viewing angle, observer viewing position, and observer-to-observer variability affect the ability to confirm the cleanliness of manufacturing equipment.
 |
October 2, 2005 By:Richard J. Forsyth, Vincent Van Nostrand Pharmaceutical Technology
Formulation residue, observer viewing distance, light intensity, viewing angle, observer viewing position, and observer-to-observer variability affect the ability to confirm the cleanliness of manufacturing equipment.
 |
|