EU Issues Strategy for Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccine Benefit–Risk Monitoring - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

  • Search
  • Suppliers
  • Careers

Enter a company or product name

KeywordLocation
About Search
EU Issues Strategy for Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccine Benefit–Risk Monitoring


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA), the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) issued on Nov. 5, 2009, a European strategy for influenza A (H1N1) vaccine benefit–risk monitoring.

The report specifies that the main responsibility for monitoring the safety and effectiveness of vaccines lies with vaccine manufacturers. As specified by EMEA’s Committee of Human Medicinal Products, these activities include conducting a prospective safety cohort study for each vaccine; surveillance of adverse events of special interest; monitoring of special population groups such as pregnant women, children, and immunocompromised subjects; and conducting studies on effectiveness and immunogenicity. These responsibilities are in addition to routine regulatory requirements.

The report points out that during the course of mass vaccination, data may also be generated by public-health centers, specialists, academic research institutions, sentinel networks, and other groups in relation to the safety and effectiveness of H1N1 vaccines. These data are important for the identification and evaluation of any new issue that may arise during the vaccination. As a result, the strategy seeks to establish interactions between various groups, national competent authorities, public-health institutions, EMEA, and ECDC to strengthen the monitoring of the benefits and risks of the vaccines.

The strategy has three major components—safety, effectiveness, and immunogenicity—that support an evidence-based benefit–risk evaluation. The strategy details the role and responsibilities of vaccine manufacturers, European Union member states, rapporteurs and corapporteurs, the CHMP and its working parties, EMEA, ECDC, and research, clinical, and public-health centers.

ADVERTISEMENT

post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What factor do you think will be most significant in 2010 for determining the health of the market for contract manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients?
The global economic recovery
The US economic recovery
Improved credit and financing flow to the small to emerging pharma/bio sector
Less restrictive inventory control by pharmaceutical companies
The level of competition from contract manufacturers in emerging markets
The global economic recovery
40%
The US economic recovery
13%
Improved credit and financing flow to the small to emerging pharma/bio sector
15%
Less restrictive inventory control by pharmaceutical companies
8%
The level of competition from contract manufacturers in emerging markets
23%
View Results
Eric LangerOutsourcing OutlookEric Langer A Bio View of Outsourcing
Patricia Van ArnumIngredients InsiderPatricia Van Arnum Advances in Custom Synthesis
Faiz kermaniSpotlightFaiz Kermani EU pricing dilemmas
Faiz kermaniStatistical Solutions Lynn Torbeck%RSD: Friend or Foe?
NSF, Microsoft Team in Cloud Computing
Keep an eye on that cargo
Pharma packs a punch
Another Boost for Vaccines
Rodney Dangerfield and R&D
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here