Enhancing the in vitro assessment of nasal sprays - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

  • Search
  • Suppliers
  • Careers

Enter a company or product name

KeywordLocation
About Search
Enhancing the in vitro assessment of nasal sprays
Can different polymers improve stability and prolong retention in model nasal spray formulations?


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe


Nasal drug delivery depends on many factors, including the conditions of use by the patient, the drug formulation, and the spray pump and aerosol characteristics. In recent years, the types of drug administered via the nasal route have expanded from locally acting drugs, such as those for allergic rhinitis, to delicate molecules for systemic activity, such as vaccines, proteins and peptides, which can be difficult to administer noninvasively. While the nasal cavity provides a delivery pathway for these large molecules, the rate of mucociliary clearance in the nasal cavity may hinder the extent of absorption. Therefore, formulators must develop mechanisms that improve absorption for high molecular weight compounds.

Formulation

As with all in vivo preparations, nasally administered drugs require a consistent and reproducible dose. Unlike a tablet, the dosing of a nasal spray must be achieved using a mechanical device. In addition, the device may deliver up to 200 doses compared with a single dose contained in a tablet. Therefore, enhancing the consistency of dose delivery to nasal sites of action requires the formulation characteristics and delivery device capabilities to be harmonized. Formulation researchers have recently explored new methods of delivering macromolecules nasally by using delivery systems such as liposomes, microspheres and gels, as well as applying bioadhesive additives such as chitosan and other ingredients to improve absorption via prolonged retention on the nasal mucosa.1–3 Other ingredients have also been used to increase the viscosity of formulations, with the goal of improving product stability during storage and increasing residence time of the formulation within the nasal passages following delivery.

For the formulator, the broad range of options that may be included as ingredients in a nasal spray presents many challenges; for instance, the addition of excipients can aid drug retention or absorption following delivery, but may also have a significant effect on the properties of the spray plume, affecting the deposition site of the aerosol. Guo demonstrated using a nasal cast that nasal sprays with a low viscosity provided greater surface coverage than higher viscosity formulations, with this being related to the particle size and, possibly, the plume geometry.4

Other studies have also confirmed the importance of the geometry of the nasal passages and the properties of the spray plume in influencing spray deposition.5–8 Guo concluded that "spray pattern, plume geometry and droplet size distribution all appeared to provide critical data for the assessment of nasal pump performance,"9 as it related to reproducible delivery from the device. Therefore, droplet size measurements, along with plume pattern and geometry assessments provide an in vitro test that can be used to understand the performance of the delivery device and how this is affected by changes to the formulation. These methods (with the exception of plume geometry) are also used as quality control tests.

This study examines the in vitro performance of different polymers, which may be used to improve stability or prolong retention, in model nasal spray formulations. Viscosity and droplet size were used to assess performance from a commercially available nasal spray device.

Methods

This study concentrates on two areas of measurement that are key concerns when developing a nasal spray product: rheological measurement (including viscosity and yield stress) and droplet size distribution. Two different formulations were studied to examine how the rheological properties affect liquid atomization. One of these was a model formulation where the concentration of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in water was changed to yield different plume characteristics. PVP was used in this study as it increases the Newtonian viscosity with only a small change to the elasticity of the sample, allowing measurement of the effect of viscosity change on the droplet size. The second formulation related to an over-the-counter product where carboxymethylcellulose and microcrystalline cellulose (CMC/MCC) had been added to impart thixotropic behaviour to prevent the product from dripping back out of the nose after administration. Each formulation was delivered using a VP3 nasal spray pump actuator (Valois, France). The two formulations were characterized using a Spraytec laser diffraction particle sizing system and a Bohlin Gemini HR Nano Rheometer (both Malvern Instruments, UK).


ADVERTISEMENT

LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
When sourcing raw materials and non-GMP intermediates or other chemicals, where are the majority of your suppliers located?
In the United States
In Western Europe
In Central and Eastern Europe
In Japan
In India
In China
In the United States
20%
In Western Europe
18%
In Central and Eastern Europe
4%
In Japan
2%
In India
27%
In China
29%
View Results
Eric LangerOutsourcing OutlookEric Langer A Bio View of Outsourcing
Patricia Van ArnumIngredients InsiderPatricia Van Arnum Advances in Custom Synthesis
Faiz kermaniSpotlightFaiz Kermani Reinvigorating European R&D innovation
Faiz kermaniStatistical Solutions Lynn Torbeck%RSD: Friend or Foe?
PhRMA Details Its Proposal for Internet and Social-Media Standards
The Unregulated Regulator
Rx-360 Goals Get off the Ground
US and Europe At Risk from Substandard Medicines
What is Next in Patent Reform?
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here