Transatlantic integration a necessity
 How likely is it that international regulators will agree to an integrated drug approval process?
|
The current global diversity of drug approval processes is negatively impacting drug launches, which is why Frost & Sullivan
believes there is a "pressing need" for the integration of the US and EU regulatory environments. "The future of the pharmaceutical
industry lies in the globalization of drug approval processes," said Sylvia Findlay, Programme Leader at Frost & Sullivan.
Speaking exclusively to Pharmaceutical Technology Europe (PTE), Findlay explained that approval process synchronization would help streamline regulatory costs and prevent drug launch
delays. "Transatlantic regulatory convergence will have immense benefits such as faster technology transfer, the harmonization
of patent laws and pausing the regulatory approval of unsafe drugs," said Findlay. "This will ensure a faster approval process
and enable new drugs to reach the entire medical community faster."
Regulatory agencies are already working towards a standard set of processes. "The FDA is working with the International Conference
on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) to bring in transatlantic
regulation," she said. "There has already been good progress on this front, especially with the introduction of the common
technical document, which allows data in the same format to be submitted to drug review authorities in all three ICH regions:
Europe, the US and Japan." Additionally, there have been improvements in the sharing of information between regulators; for
example, important information regarding pending approvals, post-marketing surveillance and enforcement actions concerning
products and facilities in Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan and the EU are being shared with the FDA.But it is not just transatlantic integration that is required; there is also a large amount of diversity between EU member
states, although efforts have been made to harmonize regulatory procedures. "This was partly achieved by the introduction
of a centralized procedure and mutual recognition procedures," Findlay explained. "However, there still lies a major gap between
the regulatory authorities and the national pricing authorities." Centralized procedures authorizing the sale of drugs in
all member states do exist, but companies still need to file for price on reimbursement approvals, which affects the launch
timing of new drugs and influences parallel trading.
Despite the positive progress that has already been made towards transatlantic integration, however, will it ever fully be
realized? An online survey conducted by PTE revealed that people were very unsure about whether regulators would ever agree to an integrated drug approval process; 32%
of respondents said it was unlikely, but 45% believed it was possible. Findlay, herself, seems confident that integration
will occur. "The formation of a common transatlantic regulation is quite near," she said. "As the pharma industry is moving
towards globalization, regulatory convergence is critical."
The full interview with Sylvia Findlay can be read at: http://www.ptemag.com/findlay