Maximizing PAT Benefits from Bioprocess Modeling and Control - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

  • Search
  • Suppliers
  • Careers

Enter a company or product name

KeywordLocation
About Search
Maximizing PAT Benefits from Bioprocess Modeling and Control


Pharmaceutical Technology





Process analytical technology (PAT), according to the US Food and Drug Administration's Web site ( http://www.fda.gov/cder/OPS/PAT.htm#Introduction), is defined as:
a system for designing, analyzing, and controlling manufacturing through timely measurements (i.e., during processing) of critical quality and performance attributes of raw and in-process materials and processes with the goal of ensuring final product quality. It is important to note that the term analytical in PAT is viewed broadly to include chemical, physical, microbiological, mathematical, and risk analysis conducted in an integrated manner.

Many tools are available for PAT. This article focuses on the knowledge discovery available from the creation and operation of a virtual plant environment. Such an environment can involve the synergistic use of model predictive control, first-principal models, neural networks, and principal component analysis, as described in New Directions in Bioprocess Modeling and Control (1).

Advantages of a virtual plant

The virtual plant is a relatively new concept that should not be confused with existing simulation methods for process design, configuration checkout, and operating training systems. Most existing batch-process simulations are off-line and noninteractive, and most real-time dynamic-process simulations were designed originally for continuous processes. These real-time process simulations can develop severe numerical errors or even fail for the extreme conditions of batch operations. They also may require interfaces for communication of input–output, inventory controls, and coordination with the control system of speedup, slowdown, pause, and resume. The control-system engineer is probably most familiar with tieback simulations because these have been used predominantly for configuration checkout and operating training systems. The process response in these tiebacks is mimicked by the trial-and-error adjustment of ramp rates triggered by the opening and closing of valves or the turning on or off of pumps.


Figure 1: Virtual plant with imported configuration from actual plant and embedded advanced control tools and process simulation.
The first key feature that distinguishes a virtual plant from process simulators is its ability to use the actual configuration, historian, displays, and advanced-control tool set of the real plant without translation, emulation, special interfaces, or custom modifications. The configuration database from the real plant can be exported and then imported and downloaded into a personal computer or a control-system computer just as if it were an actual hardware controller. Files for operator graphics, process-history charts, and data history from the real plant can be copied to the computer for the virtual plant so that the user has the entire control system of the real plant on a computer (see Figure 1).

Most dynamic, high-fidelity, process-simulation software allows users to build a basic control strategy or sequence inside the simulation environment. Nonetheless, simulation developers tend to have a process rather than a control background and focus. It is unrealistic to expect the process and batch-control capability offered by simulation software to be in the same realm as the control capability of a distributed control system's (DCS) software developed from hundreds of years of experience by process-control experts. The overall control functionality in process simulators is primitive compared with the capabilities offered in the modern DCS, which offers capabilities such as sequential function charts and basic function blocks, a batch manager, and advanced control tools such as multivariable model predictive control. These are almost nonexistent in simulators. Duplicating even a simplified version of a control system in a dynamic simulation is a large effort. At best, a user may end up with two control systems with no assurance of how well they match up and with no way to automatically manage changes between them.


ADVERTISEMENT

post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What is your main concern regarding the outsourcing of various services to emerging countries?
Safety and quality issues
Lack of regulation
Job losses in the West
The distance
I have no concerns
Safety and quality issues
47%
Lack of regulation
22%
Job losses in the West
13%
The distance
2%
I have no concerns
16%
View Results
Jim MillerOutsourcing OutlookJim Miller Be Careful for What You Wish
Patricia Van ArnumIngredients InsiderPatricia Van ArnumAugmenting Excipient Functionality
Faiz kermaniSpotlightFaiz Kermani Reducing the number of failures in early stage development
Faiz kermaniStatistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckOn the Verge of Significance: Why 5%?
Actos Cashes In On Avandia Safety Concerns
sanofi aventis Unhappy About Generic Lovenox Approval
Comparative Effectiveness and the Patient-Doctor Relationship
J&J and Guilt by Association
B2B 2.0
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here