The goal of early clinical trials is to establish the safety and proof-of-concept efficacy of a new API.1 Limited amounts of the API and aggressive development timelines, however, often force formulators to develop simple hard
gelatin capsule formulations for earlyphase clinical use;2 the composition of which could be the API alone, or a simple powder blend of the API and a filler. Not only are they useful
for simplifying formulations, hard gelatin capsules are also useful for masking the taste and odour of the active blend as
well as for blinding marketed products. The positive comparators can easily be blinded as tabletsincapsules or capsule-in-capsules.
While hard gelatin capsule formulations for earlyphase studies have many desirable features, they are not commercially viable
most of the time.3,4 The reason for this is that the manufacture of early clinical formulations cannot usually be transferred to large-scale
production equipment and, as such, the development of a second drug product for latephase clinical studies that can be manufactured
on a large-scale and is chemically compatible, stable and bioavailable, is necessary. Based on economic and certain marketing
considerations, tablets are most often formulated for latestage clinical trials and commercialization; they are more tamper-resistant
than hard gelatin capsules and may be compressed in a myriad of shapes. Tablets are preferentially film coated to obtain a
vast array of aesthetic images and these film coatings may also provide a vehicle for anti-counterfeiting measures (brand
security), brand identification, functional characteristics such as odour, oxygen and moisture vapour barriers, and enhancing
ease of swallowing. The preference for tablets is borne out by approval statistics from the FDA: from 1996 through to 2006,
a total of 10139 tablets and 2700 capsules were approved by the FDA, which corresponds to an approximate 4:1 preference of
tablets versus capsules.5
The Capsule-to-Tablet formulation concept, owned by Colorcon Inc. (PA, USA), is proposed to reduce the amount of work required
to develop capsule and tablet formulations. Ideally, the same formulation would be used in capsules for early clinical phases
and, subsequently, in tablets for commercialization. As the excipients are identical, the stability of the clinical capsule
formula and commercial tablets should be similar. By using a common formulation, the amount of excipient compatibility testing
can be reduced, which would lead to corresponding decreases in analytical testing and report writing. Realizing that the amounts
of APIs may be very limited, it is suggested that starting Capsule-to-Tablet formulations be developed based on model drugs
that have the same dose and solubility characteristics of the APIs if they are in short supply.
The feasibility of the Capsule-to-Tablet concept was initially demonstrated using cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride as a model
drug.6 The objective of the present study was to further support this concept by extending the work to four different model drugs
of varying dose and solubility. All the products were tested for their physical properties, content uniformity and dissolution
profiles to demonstrate the similarity in product performance between capsules, uncoated tablets and film-coated tablets.